Harry Potter & the Half-Blood Prince Film Review

Latest Potter Film Diminishes Most Magic of Its Stars and Storyline

© Nick Rogers

Sep 20, 2009
Daniel Radcliffe in the latest , Jaap Buitendijk
Who'd have thought, on the cusp of closing the Harry Potter franchise, that the films would be so deathly boring? Why, it's enough to make one long for Chris Columbus.

J.K. Rowling’s powerful writing revels in the wonderment of everything – the first stirrings of true love all the way to fantastic depictions of fictitious wizardry. Although Rowling’s later Harry Potter tales can get bogged down in detail, they never lose that sense of fascination – which was the very focal point of their success.

How stupefying and sad, then, that the Harry Potter films have chosen bloat over beguilement and an adherence to realism that stifles Rowling’s trickster-storytelling wiles.

Director David Yates' Stuffy Approach Bodes Poorly for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is the second film in the franchise directed by David Yates, and his stamp bodes poorly for the story’s final moments. (He’s also directing the two-part cinematic split of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.)

All but a handful of moments in Half-Blood Prince feel like a loop back around to the laziest parts of Yates’ take on Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. And this time, there’s not even a villain as buoyant as Dolores Umbridge to shake off lethargy.

Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson and Michael Gambon Return for Half-Blood Prince

Yates’ direction does work in fits and starts, namely the careful touch he brings to the very opening shot – Professor Albus Dumbledore’s (Michael Gambon) steady, guiding hand on the uneasy, quivering shoulder of Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe).

Mortally entwined with the evil Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes, sorely missed in this installment), Harry has seen so many spells cast in the name of destructive evil.

Looking forward to a mental escape from his torment in his latest year at Hogwarts, Harry instead finds a potions-class text belonging to the “Half-Blood Prince” – a book that guides him effortlessly through even the most challenging concoctions.

Soon enough, he and his best friends – Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson) – are pulled back into Voldemort’s vicious cycle of violence.

His minions (led by Helena Bonham Carter) wreak havoc in plain daylight on humans in London. Dumbledore exposes Harry to extracted memories of one Tom Riddle (Hero Fiennes-Tiffin, Ralph’s nephew). And Professor Horace Slughorn (Jim Broadbent, a sort of Milton Waddams for the Harry Potter universe) – who takes Harry as a prized pupil – may be connected to the dark lord.

Charm Spell of Harry Potter Romances Wears Off Quickly, and Yates Botches Big Moments

As teen romance is concerned, Half-Blood Prince is hormonal without getting horndog, although plenty wily within the confines of its PG rating. But a squidgy middle section – with everyone going lulu over each other – loses luster, and glossing over cliquish developments among Harry, Ron and Hermione turns things tepid. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire remains the only film in the franchise to reconcile the teens’ romantic longings with the ornate fantasy storytelling.

Just when they should be at their peak, the stakes feel small (namely in a clumsily filmed wheat-field chase). And right at the very moment when the tale should take on titanic weight, it turns turgid. Without spoiling anything, Yates botches what should the emotional highpoint of the saga thus far, choosing to film it from a purely passive perspective.

He also relegates the identity of the Half-Blood Prince to an afterthought – an “oh, um, yeah, sure” moment meant to explain the title in a quick rush toward the finale.

Here's Hoping Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint Find Fame Beyond Franchise

There is joy to be found in Half-Blood Prince, just as there has been in all of the movies – watching Radcliffe, Grint and Watson grow as characters and performers.

Radcliffe conveys understated, square-jawed respect for the challenging things a beloved mentor must ask a student to do. Watson is quietly devastating as unrequited love unmoors Hermione from her proper behavior. And Grint walks that tricky line between Ron’s spotlight jealousy of Harry and his loyalty as a friend

These are wonderful performers all, and it’s a strong hope that each has an acting future beyond this franchise. The magic is still there for them, but it has all but gone from the Harry Potter films.


The copyright of the article Harry Potter & the Half-Blood Prince Film Review in Fantasy Films is owned by Nick Rogers. Permission to republish Harry Potter & the Half-Blood Prince Film Review in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


Daniel Radcliffe in the latest , Jaap Buitendijk
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo